Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data
Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1219

reference
772-tree-1
name
1219
tree-preservation-order

undefined

772-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.036655 50.863407)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.036599 50.863401,-1.036601 50.863412,-1.036609 50.863422,-1.036621 50.863430,-1.036637 50.863435,-1.036655 50.863437,-1.036672 50.863435,-1.036688 50.863430,-1.036701 50.863423,-1.036709 50.863413,-1.036712 50.863402,-1.036710 50.863390,-1.036702 50.863380,-1.036689 50.863372,-1.036674 50.863367,-1.036656 50.863365,-1.036639 50.863367,-1.036623 50.863372,-1.036610 50.863380,-1.036602 50.863389,-1.036599 50.863401)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL